Sent: 10/31/2011 2:27:12 PM Central Standard Time
Subject: LandLords vs. CitySt.Paul Magner et al USSC10-1032 (6)Conference'sMon. 31Oct2011Legal Notice to all Candidate's, Media et alCandidate Sharon Anderson Ward 2 is giving Legal Noticeto the State of Minnesota:It seem Bizzare that now (6) Conferences in USSC: 10-1032titled Gallagher (LandLords) vs. City St.Paul _Magner who lives inStillwater et al.JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED:FURTHER: is the Mayor of the City of St.Paul via Louise Seeba School Board Candidate_Lead Counsel using undue influence willful neglience to notifythe Voting_Taxpaying Public the Fidicuary Risks of this Lawsuit?Forward,Circulate and use in your Campaigns,
Magner v. Gallagher
Issue: (1) Whether disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act; and, if so (2) what test should be used to analyze them.
Docket: 10-1032
Certiorari-stage documents
- Opinion below (8th Cir.)
- Petition for certiorari
- Brief in opposition of respondents Thomas J. Gallagher et al.
- Petitioners’ reply
- Amicus brief of International Municipal Lawyers Association
No. 10-1032 Title:
Steve Magner, et al., Petitioners v. Thomas J. Gallagher, et al. Docketed: February 16, 2011 Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Case Nos.: (09-1209) Decision Date: September 1, 2010 Rehearing Denied: November 15, 2010
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Feb 14 2011 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 18, 2011) Mar 18 2011 Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by International Municipal Lawyers Association. Mar 30 2011 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 15, 2011. Apr 15 2011 Response Requested . (Due May 16, 2011) May 4 2011 Order extending time to file response to petition to and including June 15, 2011, for all respondents. Jun 15 2011 Brief of respondents Thomas J. Gallagher, et al. in opposition filed. Jun 28 2011 Letter from counsel for respondents Frank J. Steinhauser, et al. received. Jun 28 2011 Reply of petitioners Steve Magner, et al. filed. Jun 29 2011 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 26, 2011. Oct 3 2011 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 7, 2011. Oct 11 2011 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 14, 2011. Oct 24 2011 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 28, 2011. Oct 31 2011 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 4, 2011.
~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~ Attorneys for Petitioners: Louise Toscano Seeba 750 City Hall 15 W. Kellogg Blvd. (651)-266-8772 St. Paul, MN 55102 louise.seeba@ci.stpaul.mn.us Party name: Steve Magner, et al. Attorneys for Respondents: Sonia Miller-Van Oort Sapientia Law Group (612) 756-7125 Counsel of Record 12 South Sixth Street Suite 1242 Minneapolis, MN 55402 soniamv@sapientialaw.com Party name: Thomas J. Gallagher, et al. John R. Shoemaker Shoemaker & Shoemaker, P.L.L.C. (952) 224-4610 Counsel of Record International Plaza, Suite 200 7900 International Drive Minneapolis, MN 55425 Party name: Frank J. Steinhauser, et al. Matthew A. Engel The Engel Firm P.L.L.C 333 Washington Avenue North, #300 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Party name: Thomas J. Gallagher, et al. Bee Vue 21301 Furman St., NE Wyoming, MN 55092 Party name: Bee Vue and Lamena Vue Other: Kevin M. Decker Briggs and Morgan PA (612) 977-8400 2200 IDS Center 80 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 kdecker@briggs.com Party name: International Municipal Lawyers Association
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Blogger:www.facebook.com/sharon4anderson www.twitter.com/sharon4anderson Homestead Act of 1862 neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson | ScribdDocument's are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home |www.slideshare.com/sharonanderson www.taxthemax.blogspot.comwww.sharon4anderson.org
FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are makinknowledge gained as financial journalists , securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in g such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26
The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers
Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption 3Apr0http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htm Sharon4Council: DLJ Management v. City St. Paul A06-2118,Money LaunderinNo direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937) g andFCC Complaints - http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.com
1Attached Images
No comments:
Post a Comment