CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE REQUEST4MNAG OPINION
SEPARATION POWERS https://www.leg.state.mn.us/docs/2003/mandated/030343.pdf
| Ord 20-14 | 4 | 17 | Ordinance | Creating Chapter 193 of the Legislative Code (Title XIX) pertaining to Tenant Protections. |
PLEASE NOTE CALIFORNIA CASE Sub City Council St. PAUL,MN
Blogger: User Profile: Sharon4Anderson
Christensen v. California Judicial Council | Pacific Legal Foundation
Christensen-v.-California-Judicial-Council-Petition-for-Peremptory-Writ-of-Mandate.pdf
by issuing 11 emergency rules of court. Among these was Emergency Rule 1 (“ER 1”), which violates the fundamental rights of property owners by indefinitely suspending their right to initiate unlawful detainer actions. The rule creates the perverse incentive for all tenants, whether they face financial hardship or not, to refuse to pay their rent during the crisis. And it immunizes from eviction even tenants who create nuisances, damage property, conduct illegal activity, or violate lease terms. ER 1’s restrictions not only visit significant hardship on landlords like Petitioners; they are also unconstitutional.
Christensen v. California Judicial Council | Pacific Legal Foundation
Christensen-v.-California-Judicial-Council-Petition-for-Peremptory-Writ-of-Mandate.pdf
by issuing 11 emergency rules of court. Among these was Emergency Rule 1 (“ER 1”), which violates the fundamental rights of property owners by indefinitely suspending their right to initiate unlawful detainer actions. The rule creates the perverse incentive for all tenants, whether they face financial hardship or not, to refuse to pay their rent during the crisis. And it immunizes from eviction even tenants who create nuisances, damage property, conduct illegal activity, or violate lease terms. ER 1’s restrictions not only visit significant hardship on landlords like Petitioners; they are also unconstitutional.
- Government cannot deprive landlords of their right to evict tenants who are able to pay rent yet refuse to do so, crippling their businesses and handicapping their ability to help tenants who face financial hardship.
- The California Constitution’s separation of powers prevents government agencies like the California Judicial Council from overriding the legislature and governor to take the law into its own hands and make social policy.
NO STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ON FRAUD OR MURDER WHAT YOU PEOPLE DID TO PETTIFORD FAMILY DYING OF KIDNEY FAILURE TAKING HIS HOME AT 603 EDMOND IS UNFORGIVABLE.
FRI.19Jun2020 TO THE ABOVE NAMED; Specifically Clerk Shari Moore, Senate 64 Candidates Sharon,Erin, Patricia. Note to Patricia to Legal Marijuana for the Blind as Sharons
Blindness exploited by DFL THE PARTY of Hatred, Dispair,Disparity
Ruling Case USSC 10-1032 tITLED Magner vs Gallagher
Citys Dirty Deals https://www.nationalbcc.org/images/stories/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf
The effects of sacrificing Newell’s case will cost American taxpayers the opportunity to recover up to $200 million and allow St.
FRI.19Jun2020 TO THE ABOVE NAMED; Specifically Clerk Shari Moore, Senate 64 Candidates Sharon,Erin, Patricia. Note to Patricia to Legal Marijuana for the Blind as Sharons
Blindness exploited by DFL THE PARTY of Hatred, Dispair,Disparity
Ruling Case USSC 10-1032 tITLED Magner vs Gallagher
Citys Dirty Deals https://www.nationalbcc.org/images/stories/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf
The effects of sacrificing Newell’s case will cost American taxpayers the opportunity to recover up to $200 million and allow St. Paul’s misdeeds to go unpunished. Far more troubling, however,
Far more troubling, however, is the fundamental damage that this quid pro quo has done to the rule of law in the United States and to the reputation of the Department of Justice as a fair and impartial arbiter of justice.
Please note Affiant Sharon4usa Property owner state and alleges that Erin Murphy the DFL edorse 4 Gov, got dumped by Current Gov Tim Waltz and Muslin MNAG Keith Ellison.DFL CHAIR TOM PEREZ.
Erin would have made a better Governor However This Current City Ordinance Tenant Remedys is subject to Fail if Passed.
HOWEVER when City Council DFL ENDORSE Erin Murphy
puts all Litigants,Republicans at Risk for Fair Impartial hearings,Comments
Please read Sharons Chamber Response http://sharonsenate64.blogspot.com
Sharon Learned about Law and Computers. Exposing Government Misconduct re QuiTam Relator.e. Her professional experience includes being a political activist.[1]
SAFETY: We pledge to make public safety ,Ethics in government . Fair Housing,Realestate Equity Skimming,Quiet Titles,
Magner v. Gallagher
Magner v. Gallagher
No. 10-1032 In the Supreme Court of the United States STEVE MAGNER, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. THOMAS J. GALLAGHER, ET AL
QUESTIONS PRESENTED
1. Whether disparate-impact claims are cognizable under Section 804(a) of the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3604(a). 2. Whether the court of appeals correctly applied a burden-shifting framework in analyzing respondents’ disparate-impact claims.
| 6/24/2020 |  | 10:00 AM | Council Chambers - 3rd Floor Remote public hearing for Ord 20-14 | Meeting details |  Agenda |
| Ord 20-14 | 4 | 17 | Ordinance | Creating Chapter 193 of the Legislative Code (Title XIX) pertaining to Tenant Protections. |
| Creating Chapter 193 of the Legislative Code (Title XIX) pertaining to Tenant Protections. |
| Sponsors: | Mitra Jalali, Jane L. Prince, Nelsie Yang, Rebecca Noecker, Amy Brendmoen |
122 Comments
| 6/18/2020 10:02 AM | SharonSen64 | Against |
What a Waste of Cable Time Confusing Amendments, Renters Mita and Nelsie huge Conflicts,City's override State and Federal Constitutions re USSC 10-1032 titled Magner vs. Gallagher Dirty Dealings http://sharangel.blogspot.com
Further each and every Comments must be shown on the Screen on Cable 18 This is another TRASH issue
|
The St. Paul City PO Box 4656, Saint Paul, MN 55104 | info@murphyfor64.com
Council will hold a virtual public hearing on Wednesday, June 24 at 10:00 am for Ord 20-14 Creating Chapter 193 of the Legislative Code pertaining to Tenant Protections. Information on how to participate in this meeting is located as the first attachment on the agenda item or here. The link on the
Who’s running
Senate District 64 re
for the Minnesota Legislature in 2020 | MinnPostagenda
Who’s running
Senate District 64 re
Peter Callaghan | MinnPost
- Incumbent: Richard Cohen DFL NOT RUNNING
- From: St. Paul
- First elected: 1
Candidate Filings986
Candidates
- Sharon Anderson R [Website]
- PO Box 4656, Saint Paul, MN 55104 | info@murphyfor64.com
Legal Marijunia Party LMN - Google Search- Patricia McArdell LMN
Supporters — Erin Murphy | Candidate for MN Senate - 64- Erin Murphy DFL [Website]
2020 Elections: Protected or Infected?
The League of Women Voters St. Paul (LWVSP), with support from the St. Paul Neighborhood Network, presents "2020 Elections: Protected or Infected?” a free program on Tuesday, June 30, 6:30pm - 8:00pm.
will be removed at 12:00 pm on Tuesday, June 23.
Erin Murphy for State Senate - Home
Erin Murphy: Now is Our Moment.
Erin Murphy for State Senate - Home
Erin Murphy: Now is Our Moment.
In a message dated 6/16/2020 2:20:02 PM Central Standard Time, sharon4anderson@aol.com writes:
AFFIANT SharonScarrellaAnderson Current Candidate
http://sharonsenate64.blogspot.com Forensic Files http://sharangel.blogspot.com
On the graves of her parents Tenants in Common till Death
Do us Part, will Continue to expose http://citystpaul-ponzi-principal.blogspot.com
xx
Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch
